On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 21:54 -0500, Michel Salim wrote: > 2006/12/1, Michel Salim <michel.salim@xxxxxxxxx>: > Just checked and there's no Bugzilla entry for the review request. > tetex-beamer *is* listed in owners.list, though. > > Should I ask for a review of the updated package, and only after it > pass request the branches? > Yes. Please do the review request before importing it, so that we can ensure the package's QA stuff, especially if it was dropped for a few releases. > (and what happens if one were to run cvs-import.sh and the package is > already in the tree, but does not have a -devel branch, as is the case > here) IIRC, it will create a new devel/ branch, but you need to use the "-b <branch>" option if you're importing it into a branch that already exists. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
