Re: pacakge classification and selection (was Re: New Comps Groups)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:15 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So, in short, I think the comps push, while fitting in our current
> > infrastructure, isn't really solving the *right* problem. We need a
> > better interface... something like Amazon or freshmeat or <insert
> > handwaving>.
> 
> I seem to recall some discussion a while back about replacing
> owners.list with a database, perhaps this could be the first step in
> this direction.  We could add keywords to each package which a user
> could search.
> 
Currently, this is a later step rather than a first step.  The
conversion of owners.list has immediate application to the new
buildsystem and other infrastructure that we want to have ready for FC7
so it's getting priority.

If someone wants to code some proof of concept around this it's welcome,
though.  It doesn't even have to be integrated into the main packagedb
testing as the information can be merged at a later date.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux