On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 19:43 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Jarod Wilson schrieb: > > On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 17:33 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> CCing jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx, owner of beryl > >> Mamoru Tasaka schrieb: > >>> Clive Messer wrote: > >>>> It looks like only some of beryl has been pushed to repo ....... > >>> Missing deps are under FE-Review or are waiting for FE CVS to > >>> come back again to be rebuilt. > >> Then why the heck was beryl build for FC-6 if it was known that some > >> hardcoded deps were not yet in cvs and not ready to be build? People > >> will run into issues that way when using yum and thus the it's just a > >> totally stupid thing to do in a stable branch (and even quite bad in the > >> deel-branch, too). > >> /me is getting more and more annoyed with all those broken deps and > >> broken upgrade paths (some of them for months)... > > The only hard-coded deps that can't be met at the moment are on the > > meta-packages for installing all the beryl bits. As mentioned, the > > initial beryl-core package had no unresolved deps, but subsequent > > discussion while reviewing other beryl components led to the creation of > > some meta-packages to make installing all beryl bits easier for > > end-users. > > I appreciate that idea, but it would have been better if you would have > waited realizing this idea until the bits that the meta-packages > requires are at least in CVS and ready to build. ;) Yeah, definitely. Like I said, I think I just wasn't thinking at the time, too much going on... > > I guess I wasn't thinking when I pushed the beryl-core build > > w/the meta-packages enabled. My apologies for being "totally stupid". > > Sorry, maybe I overreacted a bit. I thought it was maybe a bit harsh for a first offense, but you've been more involved in FE a lot longer than I have, so I took it with a grain of salt. A gentle, "hey, please don't do that" would have achieved the same end -- dialog and education, but no worries. > But we get more at more of this little > mistakes and stuff here and there that don't get fixed. This will definitely get fixed. Once cvs does... :( > That really annoys me. We really need to be more careful. Agreed. > > Of > > course, this would be (mostly) moot by now had cvs not taken a > > nose-dive... :) > > Yeah, bad luck. > > Anyway, thx for your work on the beryl packages! :) -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
