CCing jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx, owner of beryl Mamoru Tasaka schrieb: > Clive Messer wrote: >> It looks like only some of beryl has been pushed to repo ....... > Missing deps are under FE-Review or are waiting for FE CVS to > come back again to be rebuilt. Then why the heck was beryl build for FC-6 if it was known that some hardcoded deps were not yet in cvs and not ready to be build? People will run into issues that way when using yum and thus the it's just a totally stupid thing to do in a stable branch (and even quite bad in the deel-branch, too). /me is getting more and more annoyed with all those broken deps and broken upgrade paths (some of them for months)... CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list