On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 17:33 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > CCing jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx, owner of beryl > > Mamoru Tasaka schrieb: > > Clive Messer wrote: > >> It looks like only some of beryl has been pushed to repo ....... > > Missing deps are under FE-Review or are waiting for FE CVS to > > come back again to be rebuilt. > > Then why the heck was beryl build for FC-6 if it was known that some > hardcoded deps were not yet in cvs and not ready to be build? People > will run into issues that way when using yum and thus the it's just a > totally stupid thing to do in a stable branch (and even quite bad in the > deel-branch, too). > > /me is getting more and more annoyed with all those broken deps and > broken upgrade paths (some of them for months)... The only hard-coded deps that can't be met at the moment are on the meta-packages for installing all the beryl bits. As mentioned, the initial beryl-core package had no unresolved deps, but subsequent discussion while reviewing other beryl components led to the creation of some meta-packages to make installing all beryl bits easier for end-users. I guess I wasn't thinking when I pushed the beryl-core build w/the meta-packages enabled. My apologies for being "totally stupid". Of course, this would be (mostly) moot by now had cvs not taken a nose-dive... :) -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
