Re: beryl: missing deps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 20:30 +0000, Clive Messer wrote:
> I'm not complaining; really! I've been happily following the devel version of 
> these packages from wilson.net and waiting for their official release from 
> extras. Thanks for the work you have put in.

Glad to know the work is still appreciated, despite the havoc I've
caused. :)

> But, forgetting the meta packages for the moment, I would expect at the same 
> time as beryl-core was pushed to extras, to at least also be able to pull 
> beryl-manager, beryl-settings, beryl-plugins, emerald and emerald-themes. 
> What is the point of even making beryl-core available without these packages 
> also having been released at the same time?

Well, beryl-core did need to get pushed first, so as to make
beryl-core-devel available somewhere so that all the other packages
could get built. If I'm remembering correctly (always a big *if* :), I
pushed beryl-core for FC6 on Thursday, with the intention of building
all the bits above you mention on Friday morning, but then cvs went
bonk...

/me anxiously awaits the resurrection of cvs so as to right the wrongs
he has (cvs) committed... :)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux