On 10/4/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:26 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> %changelog
> +* Wed Oct 04 2006 Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1.03-6
> +- add explict requires on perl(Readonly::XS). perl(Readonly::XS) is available
> + for all architectures fedora supports, so there's no good reason to not
> + require it.
Hm... except maybe that there's now a build dependency loop,
perl-ReadOnly-XS BuildRequires perl-ReadOnly.
Almost... perl-Readonly requires (not buildrequires)
perl(Readonly::XS), whereas perl-Readonly-XS requires and
buildrequires perl(Readonly). So long as perl-Readonly is built and
in the repos before perl-Readonly-XS is queued, and perl-Readonly-XS
is available before someone tries to install perl-Readonly, we're
good.... right?
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
