On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:52:25 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > On 10/4/06, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:26 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > > > %changelog > > > +* Wed Oct 04 2006 Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1.03-6 > > > +- add explict requires on perl(Readonly::XS). perl(Readonly::XS) is available > > > + for all architectures fedora supports, so there's no good reason to not > > > + require it. > > > > Hm... except maybe that there's now a build dependency loop, > > perl-ReadOnly-XS BuildRequires perl-ReadOnly. > > Almost... perl-Readonly requires (not buildrequires) > perl(Readonly::XS), whereas perl-Readonly-XS requires and > buildrequires perl(Readonly). So long as perl-Readonly is built and > in the repos before perl-Readonly-XS is queued, and perl-Readonly-XS > is available before someone tries to install perl-Readonly, we're > good.... right? Still a loop, or what am I missing? Assume you start from scratch: 1. rpmbuild perl-Readonly => works 2. rpmbuild perl-Readonly-XS => needs BuildRequires perl-Readonly, which in turn Requires perl-Readonly-XS, which hasn't been built yet => *boom* -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
