Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> rather than to the packager. Also I don't buy the efficiency argument: 
> glibc is used by every single executable in a Fedora environment, and 
> therefore is constantly in memory and hot in the cache. There should be 
> a powerful argument to link against something other than glibc, and a 
> faster startup time seems unconvincing.

Enrico tested the running executables and found those statically linked
against dietlibc to be faster.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux