Hello, 3 packages submitted by Enrico are under review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 Enrico linked these small daemons statically with dietlibc. Other contributors disagree with this choice, but I think that the situation should be clarified once for all, and it should said whether this is a blocker or not. My personal point of view is that linking statically (and against dietlibc) shouldn't be a blocker if * the maintainer is aware of the security implications, and that he has to follow the security issues regarding the package linked statically against and rebuild as soon as it is out, * there is a gain in term of efficiency (and potentially portability). And it should be well understood that these are exceptions. Of course the submitter has still to agree with that. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
