paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Wouters) writes: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 > ... > But I don't think we should start using different c libraries for > random binaries. Tickets above are not for "random binaries" but for projects which are designed for dietlibc. Using glibc for them would make binaries larger, slower and increases memory usage without providing a single gain. Enrico -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
