On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:33:46AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > I disagree with you on SPF in many regards, but this part I totally agree > > with. Having a package behave totally differently depending simply on the > > *presence* of a perl module is bad behavior. > That's true of a lot of other (optional) perl modules in spamassassin. Oh, I know. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
