On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 19:54 +0200, Paul Wouters wrote: > If that is redhat's opinion, they should stop publishing spf records. Do not mistake the publication of records by Red Hat sysadmins for a company policy which approves of such a stupid scheme. This _has_ been raised internally but I wouldn't really expect it to change any time soon. In the meantime, the company just continues to advertise its technical cluelessness in this particular respect. > So, either this should go to the sysadmins responsoble for redhat, or it should > go as a bug report to perl-Mail-SPF-Query. I'm happy to do either if I know > which one is correct. Personally, I think we should drop perl-Mail-SPF-Query, or at _least_ modify our SpamAssassin package so that it needs to be _explicitly_ asked to do SPF rather than doing so by default if the package is installed. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
