On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:30:48PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Personally, I think we should drop perl-Mail-SPF-Query, or at _least_ > modify our SpamAssassin package so that it needs to be _explicitly_ > asked to do SPF rather than doing so by default if the package is > installed. I disagree with you on SPF in many regards, but this part I totally agree with. Having a package behave totally differently depending simply on the *presence* of a perl module is bad behavior. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
