> Lately people have been using NEEDINFO_REPORTER which seems to work > well to indicate that the package is waiting on the submitter to do That's a good idea. Somehow what I was searching for. I'll go through some reviews to set them to NEEDINFO_REPORTER. > tree query). Some of us have gone through and closed bugs that are > obviously stalled out. You're of course welcome to do that as well. I may be too formal, but I think a policy on that could be a good idea. > What other information would you want that you can't just add in a > comment? If you really want additional formalism, I suppose you can > write up a proposal but I'm not sure that making things any more > complicated would actually help in any way. Personally I haven't seen > the need for much more than FE-NEW and looking at the last comment to > see what's up. Sometimes it's not so simple because there is some disagreement, or questionning about the opportunity to package the soft. But with some review closed, some NEEDINFO_REPORTER, maybe there is no need to add more complication, indeed. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
