>>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: PD> So I think that it could be nice to have the possibility to add PD> more information to submitted packages, such that potential PD> reviewers don't spend too much time searching were they could be PD> usefull. Well, first there's FE-GUIDELINES to indicate packages which are blocked on guidelines; a couple of the oldest packages are blocking that right now. Lately people have been using NEEDINFO_REPORTER which seems to work well to indicate that the package is waiting on the submitter to do something (and has the added benefit of showing up in the dependency tree query). Some of us have gone through and closed bugs that are obviously stalled out. You're of course welcome to do that as well. What other information would you want that you can't just add in a comment? If you really want additional formalism, I suppose you can write up a proposal but I'm not sure that making things any more complicated would actually help in any way. Personally I haven't seen the need for much more than FE-NEW and looking at the last comment to see what's up. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
