On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 00:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I have seen floating around the idea that there was a need for reviewers > for old reviews. So I started with the packages in FE-NEW with no activity > in eight weeks: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus?highlight=%28package%29#head-6ebf09953da14bdd17d75280dba5b4cffb941077-3 > but I had a hard time to find a package really waiting for a review. In > the end I ended up looking at all of them, and here are the statistics > (I removed kmobiletools, accepted closed): > > 7 packages are stuck in review for various reasons > 11 packages are stuck because they are waiting for submitters > 10 packages were stuck with a need of a reviewer [...] > Here are the details if you don't trust my numbers :) > > Review stuck 6: > disagreament: > fnord freedt > > licence issue: > acx-kmod acx-kmod-common > > wondering about whether it is a good idea to include in extras or not: > alsa-oss phpBB > > needsponsor 1: > gq > > waiting for submitter 11: > smixer smokeping sparse gitweb mondo lurker libpri magic socat > fxload kdiff3 > > Waiting for review 10: > xmms-musepack transconnect ardour pyscript Wcl linux-wlan-ng gpc > vdr-osdteletext vdr-subtitles sqlgrey Oddly enough, the three packages I've recently submitted for review, which are all still sitting in state FE-NEW, are not listed in any of the above groups... zabbix - 198562 ip6sic - 198586 dircproxy - 197740 If anyone wants something to review, I'd certainly welcome feedback on the above. :) -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
