>>>>> "MT" == Michael Thomas <wart@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: MT> IMHO, we need look no further than the 'Assigned To' field. I don't even see why you would care about that. If the bug blocks FE-NEW, it's not under review. The only exceptions I can think of are those that block FE-GUIDELINES, and of course the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs that require a sponsor to do the review. If someone takes the bug, they should block FE-REVIEW instead to note that the bug is under review. You'll note that I often ping people to ensure that they do this. I also regularly go through the old tickets and try to make something happen. I pretty much constantly trawl through https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=163776 to find things to work on. That shows dependencies, but you'll also note that some of the non-child bugs are assigned to folks. Some of these cases are bugs that were assigned to someone by mistake; it's not possible to unassign a bug once it's been assigned. Others are simply improperly blocking FE-NEW when they should be blocking FE-REVIEW. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
