Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 4/17/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>The only context in which the requirement would be void would be that >>of Fedora Extras, and then only if the steering committee declared >>that the Games SIG can't place that additional restriction. Which >>they haven't. So just what are you objecting to? > > > Here's what I don't understand... can I a package a game and review a > game as a normal Extras contributor without having to follow the > additional requirements of the games SIG? Yes. The SIG only enforces these additional guidelines on packages reviewed by the SIG members. --Mike
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
