>>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: RC> The point is: This requirement is legal non-sense and probably RC> void. Why on earth would this have anything to do with legality? The requirement is there for clarity; games often have custom licenses that aren't easily summarized in the 20 characters that the RPM License: tag gives us. People need to be able to see the license for the game files summarized as documentation instead of plowing through the source code. The only context in which the requirement would be void would be that of Fedora Extras, and then only if the steering committee declared that the Games SIG can't place that additional restriction. Which they haven't. So just what are you objecting to? - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
