Jason L Tibbitts III (tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > BN> With Extras... it's 'maybe, depending on the package'. Do you > BN> really expect someone to look at a web page that has maintenance > BN> status for 3000 packages? > > The only thing I really care about is that I not be prevented from or > overly encumbered in updating the packages I maintain for older Fedora > releases. > > So if I just have to introduce myself to the extras-legacy team and > say "I'll be maintaining denyhosts for FC-3" and don't have to go > through additional process then I'm perfectly happy. But if I have to > go through additional review or learn a different build system then > I'm not sure it would be worth the trouble. The idea is to get Legacy building through the same sort of system as Extras... it's just not there yet. Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
