Re: RFC: Fedora Extras EOL Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

BN> With Extras... it's 'maybe, depending on the package'. Do you
BN> really expect someone to look at a web page that has maintenance
BN> status for 3000 packages?

The only thing I really care about is that I not be prevented from or
overly encumbered in updating the packages I maintain for older Fedora
releases.

So if I just have to introduce myself to the extras-legacy team and
say "I'll be maintaining denyhosts for FC-3" and don't have to go
through additional process then I'm perfectly happy.  But if I have to
go through additional review or learn a different build system then
I'm not sure it would be worth the trouble.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux