Gérard Milmeister wrote: > Looks good for a start. Don't you think using restorecon instead of > chcon would be safer? The probability of missing something is smaller. I guess restorecon is better if you need to change a directory with different types in it. It clearer that multiple chcon's. Otherwise I think it can be left to the packager's preference. > Do these scripts work when SELinux is not installed, resp. completely > disabled? No idea. I'll add a TODO section to the page, and point feodra-selinux-list at it. Aurélien -- http://aurelien.bompard.org ~~~~ Jabber : abompard@xxxxxxxxx "Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle." -- Steinbach's Guideline for Systems Programming -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
