On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 08:52 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Gérard Milmeister wrote: > > Looks good for a start. Don't you think using restorecon instead of > > chcon would be safer? The probability of missing something is smaller. > > I guess restorecon is better if you need to change a directory with > different types in it. It clearer that multiple chcon's. > Otherwise I think it can be left to the packager's preference. > > > Do these scripts work when SELinux is not installed, resp. completely > > disabled? > > No idea. I'll add a TODO section to the page, and point feodra-selinux-list > at it. You can use /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled (if present) to determine whether SELinux is enabled or not. Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
