On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:29:31AM +0100, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > It was recently discussed on here that the importing of sodipodi may not > be that good as inkscape is the successor. > > Would it be worthwhile removing any packages on the orphaned list where > there is a successor? I think it wouldn't. In my opinion the orphaned packages should be removed based on maintainership/packaging criteria, not on potential usability criteria. If it doesn't build, has unfixed bugs and isn't required by another package, for example, but not because there is something said to be better. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
