Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, den 26.03.2006, 08:48 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 21:52 +0100 schrieb
> > Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx:
> >> fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> >>> The second solution involves a bit more work: run a script that checks for
> >>> such stuff. Christian?
> >> I'm having an hectic week, but I'll tuck this on my TODO list and see what 
> >> happens :-)
> > 
> > Seems you found enough time ;-)  
> > 
> >> What's the normal procedure when a package migrates to core ?
> >> Do we:
> >>  - delete CVS devel and affected release branches
> > 
> > I think this is the way is was done often
> 
> I would highly advise against deleting the CVS devel directory, because 
> it is horribly difficult to recreate it again.  I personally erase all 
> the files in the directory, add a README file that says what happened to 
> that package, then check that in.

We have a proper  (and similar) solution already. See the summary from
last FESCo meeting I send earlier today.
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux