Re: Fedora Extras 5 Package Build Report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 21.03.2006, 21:52 +0100 schrieb
Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx:
> fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> > The second solution involves a bit more work: run a script that checks for
> > such stuff. Christian?
> I'm having an hectic week, but I'll tuck this on my TODO list and see what 
> happens :-)

Seems you found enough time ;-)  

> What's the normal procedure when a package migrates to core ?
> Do we:
>  - delete CVS devel and affected release branches

I think this is the way is was done often

>  - tuck a "nobuild"/exit code in the spec file 

This the way it was done for a lot of orphans

> (in which case the wording 
>    should be a bit standardised so that an automated script can make sense of it

Yeah, that would be fine, but I don't think everyone will use the same
wording.

CU
thl
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux