Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-03-15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:49:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> We really should have a FE5 tree without broken deps when FC5 is
> launched. 
> 
> > 	 at-poke    0.2.2-2.i386 
> Not rebuild, orphaned, seems nothing depends on it afaics so why don't
> we remove it?

Tried to contact the packager @redhat multiple times. No response.
Posted about it to -maintainers list. The right person didn't see
that either or ignored it deliberately.

This package was imported and built without an entry in owners.list.
If that happens more often, maybe we could make the buildsys prohibit
building packages which don't have a valid owner in owners.list? ;)

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux