On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 10:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:49:03 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > We really should have a FE5 tree without broken deps when FC5 is > > launched. > > > > > at-poke 0.2.2-2.i386 > > Not rebuild, orphaned, seems nothing depends on it afaics so why don't > > we remove it? > > Tried to contact the packager @redhat multiple times. No response. > Posted about it to -maintainers list. The right person didn't see > that either or ignored it deliberately. > > This package was imported and built without an entry in owners.list. > If that happens more often, maybe we could make the buildsys prohibit > building packages which don't have a valid owner in owners.list? ;) IMO, this person has violated the rules of the game ... so he, not the package, should be facing consequences. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
