Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikdev:IDE for development of PICmicro based application (under Linux/KDE) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176026 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-15 04:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > So, what I have to do: > - exclude ppc arch? That's one option, suiteable as a short term aid. > - try to find if exist a file which provide similar functions? Better contact upstream and let them solve this issue. > > Besides this, I see more issues: The i386 log shows the package stripping > > executables/libraries and not correctly propagating RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > > I have no experience about that. What I have to do? There are at least 2 issues: 1. Makefile.pkp is broken It suffers from 2 issues: a) It uses "gcc -lstdc++" to link. This is a bug. It must use "g++" to link. b) You must propagate RPM_OPT_FLAGS to it The least intrusive approach to both problems would be to override Makefile.pkp's hard-coded crap from make's command line inside of the spec, i.e. to use something along this line: make -f Makefile.pkp \ CCPP=g++ \ LINK=g++ \ CCPPOPT="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DPKP_VERSION=0.8.4" \ LIBS= 2. You are using "make install-strip" This will strip executables during installation and render debug-infos unusable. Simply use "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_DIR" instead of "make install-strip DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_DIR" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
