Re: Mono packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> > The last one hasn't been addressed yet. The other three have.
> 
> I'm not sure why you're all up in arms.  

I'm not.

> Two of your bugs have been 
> resolved NOTABUG, one has not been resolved as you mentioned, and 
> there's the lone bug that was actually bug and has been fixed upstream, 
> and was fixed a bit ago.  Is it not fixed in 1.1.13.4-2?  

Not as far as I can see. Given that the one which was a bug had only
just been fixed up stream and the other is one which hasn't been
addressed, I can't see how either would be in 4-2.

> Also, who advised you to cross-bugzilla?  

I asked on the test-list before reporting it on the Ximian BZ and was
advised to put it on both.

> Development 
> should always happen upstream and trickle downstream to vendors, but we 
> have releases to tend to and if there is a blocker that actually breaks 
> core or extras packages, by all means please file with us with a pointer 
> to the fix if you want better attention.

Will do that in future. If it's a biggy, I'll put on the FC one, if not,
it'll be on the Ximian one.

TTFN

Paul

-- 
"Träum's nicht, Lebe schon" - Dr. Frankenfurter, Rocky Horror Show


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux