Re: Mono packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/12/2006 03:38 AM, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Hi,

Actual references would be nice.

bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77731 (FC BZ #184389)
bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77732 (FC BZ #184390)
bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77733 (FC BZ #184391)
bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77734 (FC BZ #184409)

The last one hasn't been addressed yet. The other three have.

I'm not sure why you're all up in arms. Two of your bugs have been resolved NOTABUG, one has not been resolved as you mentioned, and there's the lone bug that was actually bug and has been fixed upstream, and was fixed a bit ago. Is it not fixed in 1.1.13.4-2? You reported with an old version, and there was a new mono release since. It appears to be a minor issue, with no real hint as to what the patch is in any of the bugs. I just looked around in mono SVN and couldn't find it, either. How do you expect us to be able to do anything with that?

Also, who advised you to cross-bugzilla? I'm a bit confused why you'd do that, so is the FC maintainer, and the ximian maintainer... If you have a ximian account, reporting there is preferred. Development should always happen upstream and trickle downstream to vendors, but we have releases to tend to and if there is a blocker that actually breaks core or extras packages, by all means please file with us with a pointer to the fix if you want better attention.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux