Re: syck-python vs. python-syck?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/10/06, Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PS: Maybe also with MySQL-python, gstreamer08-python, gstreamer-python
> and libopensync-plugin-python.
While we're at it, let's rename all mono packages to mono-<pkg>, all
java packages to java-<pkg>, and all C packages to c-<pkg>. That way the
user can focus on what's really important to a user (the programming
language of the software) as opposed to irrelevant things like its brand
name that the user can identify and recognize :)

Let's not take the discussion to the extreme. The fact remains that there's already precedent on how the naming works and even the Wiki documents this as such. This has only to do with precedence in Python naming while using Perl as an example of how one deviates from syck-{lang}. syck-python is plain deceiving especially for those of us that use both Deb/Ubuntu and Fedora.

--
-jeff
-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux