Re: syck-python vs. python-syck?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/10/2006 07:16 AM, Jeff Pitman wrote:
I'm a bit surprised this made it through review. If Perl gets to have consistency in the naming of packages, why not Python? I know there's libxml2-python, etc. But, to me that's legacy baggage.

Copy that.

We have syck, perl-YAML-Parser-Syck, so a syck-python package should not exist, all other python modules do have correct naming, eg. python-sqlite, python-twisted, and so on...

So syck-python should be moved to python-syck!!!

Regarding libxml2-python; The base package is libxml2. BUT, we shoudl think about renaming this to python-libxml2 and do a Provides: libxml2-python.

my 2 cent,
 -of

PS: Maybe also with MySQL-python, gstreamer08-python, gstreamer-python and libopensync-plugin-python.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux