On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 00:27 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 06:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 00:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 06:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > Please check to make sure the job did > > > > > not actually get enqueued. > > > > How about you fixing your code to not produce false alarms, if you are > > > > sure these are false alarms? > > > > > > Cmon, that was a bit too brusque. Dan didn't deserve that sort of > > > response. > > Well how would you feel if you'd be permanently struggling with build > > failures and wasting time on issues you don't have control over - for > > months? > > > > Given Thorsten is keeping us nagging on mass rebuilds, I have started to > > confront you with the build issues in a similar way as I have been and > > am facing them - for many months! > > > > Now, you feel I am unfair? > > > > Ralf, > I do feel you're being unfair to Dan. He's not doing this > intentionally. I did NOT meant to accuse Dan and hope not to have done so. Should I have done so, then rest assured this had happened unintentional and please take my apologies. It's just that I am complaining about the buildsystem, but I dissatisfied with the current status on the build system that I am not willing to accept excuses and explanation, anymore. Either these issues can be nailed down in a reasonable manner in a reasonable time frame, or other consequences will have to be taken ... Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
