On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 06:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 00:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 06:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > Please check to make sure the job did > > > > not actually get enqueued. > > > How about you fixing your code to not produce false alarms, if you are > > > sure these are false alarms? > > > > Cmon, that was a bit too brusque. Dan didn't deserve that sort of > > response. > Well how would you feel if you'd be permanently struggling with build > failures and wasting time on issues you don't have control over - for > months? > > Given Thorsten is keeping us nagging on mass rebuilds, I have started to > confront you with the build issues in a similar way as I have been and > am facing them - for many months! > > Now, you feel I am unfair? > Ralf, I do feel you're being unfair to Dan. He's not doing this intentionally. He's doing everything he can to assess the problem and fix it. I understand you're frustrated but he doesn't deserve your wrath. Fine, something's not right but being snippy to him isn't going to motivate a fix for the problem. If anything the hatefulness is just going to demotivate anyone from contributing their time to the project. Dan doesn't _have_ to work on this. I'm sure his job at rh keeps his schedule very busy. As is always the case report the problems you're having but don't get cranky about it, it's not going to help the situation and it just makes everything that much worse all around. Thanks, -sv -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
