Christian, many thanks for these reports. I like then a lot. Some suggestions for improvements: Am Dienstag, den 07.02.2006, 18:18 +0100 schrieb Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx: > We have 58 packages not available in extras devel or release: > > GiNaC qspencer > R-hdf5 tcallawa > alsa-firmware fedora [...] Could you sort this and maybe some of the other lists by the owner and not by package name? This way each and every packager has to go through the whole list a look out for his packages. When it is sorted by owner you just have to search for your own email address -- that's a lot easier. You probably should add the domains somehow -- there are at least two people (I'm one of them) that use fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx I would suggest fedora[AT]leemhuis[DOT]info, fedora@leemhuis, fedora-leemhuis_info or something like that. And another thing: How to I get a package out of the list in case it is stuck due to legal problems or other well known things? [...] > We have 28 packages that moved to core: > anthy firefox gmime kasumi libchewing libevent m17n-db m17n-lib > nautilus-sendto perl-Archive-Zip perl-IO-String perl-IO-Zlib perl-Net-IP > perl-String-CRC32 perl-XML-Simple python-elementtree python-sqlite scim > scim-anthy scim-chewing scim-hangul scim-m17n scim-pinyin scim-qtimm > scim-tables sqlite thunderbird tog-pegasus Well, at least firefox and thunderbird (probably many more) were moved to core long time ago -- do we really need them in this list? Then it will grow endlessly over time. > We have 12 FE-NEW tickets with no activity in eight weeks This one is a great idea! Maybe is should be placed somewhere more prominent... -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
