fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said: > Could you sort this and maybe some of the other lists by the owner and not by > package name? This way each and every packager has to go through the whole > list a look out for his packages. When it is sorted by owner you just have to > search for your own email address -- that's a lot easier. Ok, will do. > You probably should add the domains somehow -- there are at least two people > (I'm one of them) that use fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx I would suggest > fedora[AT]leemhuis[DOT]info, fedora@leemhuis, fedora-leemhuis_info or > something like that. Ok. > And another thing: How to I get a package out of the list in case it is stuck > due to legal problems or other well known things? I think probably the easiest is I create a wiki page with package names that I should not check. The hardest part is choosing a page name, I guess... > Well, at least firefox and thunderbird (probably many more) were moved to > core long time ago -- do we really need them in this list? Then it will grow > endlessly over time. Yea, I agree the "moved to core" part is not so useful. I'll remove it. > This one is a great idea! Maybe is should be placed somewhere more > prominent... Thanks. It's not bullet proof, though. Some packages actually do get comment but their change date is not updated. But it's rather uncommon... Christian -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
