Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mud Magic Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176200 ------- Additional Comments From kyndig@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-25 13:26 EST ------- Thank you for the help and info. I updated my Fedora distro and performed several tests of the BuildRequires and Requires to ensure the package requirements are correct for both installing a binary rpm and rebuilding the rpm from either a source rpm or the tarball. I added the BuildRequires for the needed libs. I also added the Requires macro - though it isn't required, I'd prefer to have a user know the name of the package they need to install to satisfy requirements; opposed to the name of the shared object missing. These updates have been committed to CVS and the autoconf system for building. spec: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic.spec srpm: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic-1.8-0.fdr.4.src.rpm tarball: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic-1.8.tar.gz Once more - a warm thanks for the attention and help everyone has shown and given, Calvin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
