Re: Orphaning FreeIPA guide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/01/2016 12:15 PM, Petr Bokoc wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 09:06 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 10/15/2014 05:30 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2014 04:03 PM, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
>>>> 2014-10-15 13:01 GMT+02:00 Martin Kosek <mkosek@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> FreeIPA project is already for some time without sufficient resources to
>>>>> revive
>>>>> and maintain our former long upstream user guide. We did not find enough
>>>>> manpower either in FreeIPA developer nor our users community, so we
>>>>> decided to
>>>>> stop maintaining it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Detailed justification including links to mail threads in:
>>>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Upstream_User_Guide
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to avoid leaving any loose ends on Fedora Documentation project
>>>>> side, do you have any recommendation for us? I already closed respective
>>>>> Bugzillas and upstream Trac tickets with explanation. Should we also
>>>>> orphan the
>>>>> guide in
>>>>>
>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings#Guides
>>>>>
>>>>> or on any other locations? For starters, I think we should close the
>>>>> "freeipa-guide" component of "Fedora Documentation" as nobody from our team
>>>>> would be responding there.
>>>> Hi Martin,
>>>>
>>>> What will happen to its downstream Linux Domain Identity Management
>>>> Guide for RHEL?
>>> Hello Jérôme,
>>>
>>> RHEL guides as listed in
>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Documentation#User_Guides
>>> are still actively maintained by Red Hat Technical Writer(s) and should be up
>>> to date. I added direct links to report any bugs that FreeIPA users may find.
>>>
>>>> Should we rely solely on the product help for that documentation?
>>> No. We want to focus on documentation in FreeIPA.org project community wiki,
>>> i.e. design documents, (user) HOWTO articles or any other general articles that
>>> our users or developers contribute to.
>>>
>>> Wiki is generally much more easy to contribute due to easy syntax and narrow
>>> focus of the pages. Maintaining whole user guide book in docbook is on a whole
>>> different level of complexity and resource requirement on it's contributors -
>>> thus the move from it upstream.
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Please let me revive that old thread of mine and revisit this subject as it
>> these guides are now hurting the project too much to ignore it. We (the FreeIPA
>> project) had numerous user confusions, mistakes and problems caused by these
>> old, orphaned guides.
>>
>> We already stopped linking to the guides from the FreeIPA project pages and
>> published our User Guide statement in:
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Upstream_User_Guide
>> Currently, the only FreeIPA guides with sufficient staffing and contributions
>> to maintain that big documentation project is with Red Hat and it's Identity
>> Management guides:
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Documentation#User_Guides
>>
>> However, the problem is that these guides still pop up in search engine results
>> and FreeIPA user community members periodically come to us and are complaining
>> that some procedure from
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
>> or
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
>> or
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
>> does not work or that it is not understandable even though the fixed
>> documentation is live on Red Hat sites.
>>
>> Can we please do something about it? I would suggest either:
>>
>> 1) Add big flash-y admonition to the top of every page in the user guides
>> above, pointing to
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Documentation#User_Guides
>> or
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Upstream_User_Guide
>> which collects all information about these user guides.
> 
> This is a pretty good idea for our new future publishing system. Maybe we could
> make it automatically insert some kind of a banner as a guide reaches its EOL,
> explaining to anyone who finds it that it's out of date. We could have it
> trigger when a guide for final release X is published and slap that banner on
> every guide for release X-2. Preferably a floating one, not just something on
> top of the page, so people are sure to see it even if they open the page at an
> anchor instead of the top.
> 
> Or we could just unpublish old guides as a rule. Currently it really is pretty
> confusing.

+1, it indeed makes sense for the general case. Did you create some RFE
Bugzilla or should I do it somewhere?

>>
>> 2) Remove these guides from Fedora docs side at all and ideally add a
>> redirect to
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Documentation#User_Guides
>> or
>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Upstream_User_Guide
>>
>> I am looking for any guidance. Thank you!
>>
> 
> I agree we should definitely remove these guides - if the most recent one is 3
> years out of date and people still keep finding it and then getting confused,
> that's a no-brainer. I'm not sure about the redirects, though, I don't know if
> we can easily do that.

Good! Please keep me posted, so that I can give the good news to FreeIPA
developers!

Thanks,
Martin
--
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux