On 4 February 2016 at 14:41, Dylan Combs <dylan.combs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now, I may be so n00blar that I have an inadequate understanding of the > reasons behind the Fedora Docs infrastructure design choices, but when I > first envisioned participating in the Docs group, I expected a mega-simple > process in which I simply use a browser to navigate to the content in need > of updating or correcting, make the addition or correction, and press a > button to trigger the pull request. I was further hoping it'd all be > heavily integrated with man pages, but that appears not to be the case. In > my documentation dream world, I am simply permitted to submit pull requests > for man page modifications for any Fedora package from one streamlined > interface, but that appears not to be something we do. > On the particular issue of man pages, they belong to upstream projects, which is where those documentation efforts should usually go. I don't know if anyone (in any distro) has ever packaged patches for man pages. Fedora Docs is really about the additional documentation fedora provides through https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/index.html -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
