On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Pete Travis <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jan 22, 2015 3:56 PM, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Renaming "dnf" to "yum" would break enough of my code that I'd be >> hard-pressed to justify continuing using and remixing Fedora. >> > > Maybe you should try it, then report back all the edge cases we need to > document :P > > But seriously, that's exactly the point I was trying to make. It isn't a > drop-in replacement. It behaves differently in many ways, and nobody likes > surprises from their operating system. If you can read the docs first, less > surprises. > > --Pete > > p.s. -obligatory grumble about top posting on lists... I do plan to migrate my scripts from yum to dnf fairly soon - as soon as I figure out how to suppress document installs with dnf in a Docker image. So you'll be getting dnf bug reports if anything breaks in remixes or Docker images. -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
