On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 21:51 -0700, Pete Travis wrote: > Barring contingencies, dnf has been approved[0] as the default package > manager for Fedora 22 and subsequent releases. dnf is effectively a > complete rewrite of yum and the underlying dependency solving logic, > so > it's a substantial change. If you have been using it, and especially > if > you've been following bug reports[1], you probably know that the > behavior of dnf can differ[2] subtly or surprisingly from what we've > come to expect from yum. > > Because of the potential confusion, I propose that we make documenting > dnf a priority for the F22 release. Specifically, the System > Administrators Guide deals with package management the most, but > essentially *every* guide will have scattered yum invocations. Let's > branch each guide slated for F22, work through the changes, then > review > and merge the branch. The System Administrators guide is going to > really > need some special attention, as it should probably address all the > quirks and snags that users will run into. > > This is an excellent opportunity for new contributors. For most > guides, > the changes required are very straightforward. It would be a > closed-ended endeavor and a manageable time investment - *if* we start > soon. If you're able to take on a guide, please reply. > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF > [1] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=dnf&product=Fedora > [2] http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/cli_vs_yum.html Hello everyone, I've been using dnf for quite a while now, and filing bugs and so on. I should be able to help with this. I'll try finding some time this week and jump in. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
