Re: Release notes have a launcher - maybe we should remove that

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/30/2014 10:42 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 19:22 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
>> I really don't undertand why "not installing the release notes" is
>> such a big change we need to wait for the next cycle to implement.
>> It's really just a one line change. And if we want to install them but
>> not provide a launcher (so they could be opened by a bookmark in
>> Firefox) than I'd happily provide a patch to split the launcher to a
>> subpackage.
>
> Eh, I'm just picking my battles here. A Release Notes launcher that
> starts Firefox is not good and we should get rid of it, but it's not
> very bad either and if the release notes people want another cycle to
> rethink how to present the release notes, well why not let them have it?
>
> Another thing we could do is add it as a default web app. GNOME Software
> requires "epiphany-runtime" which is all of Epiphany except the desktop
> file, so that it can install and remove web apps. Well, why not make the
> release notes a web app -- then the release notes team gets to keep the
> desktop launcher, and we are happy since it's a real application.
>
>


Someone had proposed that in #fedora-docs late yesterday, I like it.  I'm working on some copy right now, and will go for an ephiphany web-app style presentation in GNOME for the next RPM.

For the record, the collaboration part of my arguments here are *far* more important to me than the actual inclusion of a Release Notes RPM.  It's a valid discussion, and I would much rather start on that basis, instead of potentially missing a discussion about a design philosophy on a SIG list, then finding out about the impact when I learn that an RC isn't meeting release criteria because of my package.

- --
- -- Pete Travis
 - Fedora Docs Project Leader
 - 'randomuser' on freenode
 - immanetize@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUAgFYAAoJEL1wZM0+jj2ZfXYH/A6jnJh2qnZMqMcggGjamzg4
k2tQQoT/Imx9HF3ZEebs2WlS1w2b8HVg/WBFx0joGXMV9iER8TeFQSOLndy7Col1
vmO44BtWCUJfHG6valf+g+mnXuMMeVLsPy707axSKR/glctRakD1msXiyqpz/IxF
CxFJGennU4f2ypXAPszk6SS26MkIJuY+nyB/5CDN1NAW5yWgPQ8xTH/xxPt6Imnm
KycuexVq4MrmtPO7R0VdThavxJLf9GaAR0Exv/HqJXuEhKrxsAmTMOsPsxKWyZR3
aNPGb5XDfeIz3eAkUdI7goKTxYDaeVD5sW0KxXDBBdTKnbyCK7MSpjoI3wDfB5k=
=0JZ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux