On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:17:00PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The issue was that transifex has been an ongoing problem for the > following reasons: <snip important list of reasons/details> Thanks for providing those details. I meant, and wrote it poorly I'm sure, that I presume that the situation was much as you described, but in the end there were people who did not feel/get communicated to. At that point, Infra and others were saying, "OK, sorry if you didn't hear about this before, it's been a long-standing problem, and we need to solve it now before the barn burns down." So, sorry for characterizing the communication as poor. I think what I'm seeing could benefit from some change management that all know about. A lot of times we have to result to a change management list that goes something like, "OK, ask $this_list_of_individuals_I_can_think_of, then email $this_list_of_mailing_lists_I_can_think_of, and write a blog post." Anyway, I'm sure there is a not-too-much-bureacracy way to do this. I started this ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change_management ... I'm sure there are others who deal with that all the time around here, maybe there are some existing processes we can adopt, incorporate, hug, etc. Thanks, - Karsten -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener team: Red Hat Community Architecture uri: http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki gpg: AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpCWdRJe7b9D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
