On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:48:07PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:44 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:07 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah, if we want to ship one, gwibber is pretty much the only option, > > > > > since it's most likely too late to fix pino before F14 is released. The > > > > > big cons about gwibber, in my opinion is the fairly poor performance > > > > > I've experienced with it (tho I last used it about 2 months ago) and the > > > > > number of dependencies it would pull into the livecd. > > > > > > > > Doesn't post-Beta seem too late to do this? Better to have people > > > > simply use their browser I'd think. > > > > > > well, we have to make *some* kind of post-beta change here, since as I > > > said the current situation blocks the release. I don't think subbing in > > > gwibber for pino is a particularly scary change, all we'd have to check > > > is if it goes over the size limit, and if it works, which is about half > > > an hour of effort. > > > > Right, the uncertainty I have is really around the functionality of > > the new suggested default client, as opposed to "let's not do > > anything." My preference would be a simple removal of pino for no > > other reason than least disturbance of the Force. > > I agree that removing pino, together with a suitable note in the release > notes, is the safest route at this point. Adding the docs@ list to the cc so that they are aware of the need for a release note for this. Docs folks, feel free to ask questions here on desktop@ as needed to figure out the best text. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
