Re: Guide Versioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/24/2010 09:17 PM, Chris Curran wrote:
> On 06/24/2010 11:09 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 06/24/2010 10:07 PM, Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote:
>> <snip>
>>   
>>> Things change and we need to be flexible with that but if we aren't
>>> giving our readers a chance to properly review our new guides then we
>>> aren't getting the feedback we need.  If we aren't going to fix bugs
>>> then...  well, I'm going to fix my bugs.
>>>      
>> My feeling is it would be beneficial to have the unstable development
>> docs publicly viewable.  Even if that means just the en-US versions, and
>> not the translated versions.  Something along the lines of:
>>
>>     http://docs-devel.fedoraproject.org
>>     (that's not a real site)
>>
>> Having some kind of script triggered when a git commit is performed on a
>> doc, that then uses publican to build the updated version, and publish
>> it if successful.
>>
>> For now, I'm just manually generate the VG doc myself and publishing it
>> to my personal fedorapeople.org space.  Not optimal, but it works.
>>
>> There is a "Fedora Draft Documentation" heading on docs.fp.o, and I kind
>> of wonder if that's maybe an alternative place we could put development
>> docs stuff.  It might get kind of crowded though, when we consider how
>> many different branches of docs there would be. ;)
>>
>> Regards and best wishes,
>>
>> Justin Clift
>>
>>    
> I 100% agree with unstable public branches. Quick fixes are important
> and what fedora is about. We need to be as agile as possible to stay up
> to date with changing features. Realistically, the stable branch is not
> going to be up to date for an entire fedora release (too much change).
> 
> Translators need stability. We can and should provide that for them. We
> can do both by publishing master and stable releases.

That means incorrect information will be out in the wild.  There should
be a single version of every guide published and that single guide
should be correct as far as we know it to be.
> 
> Chris

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xM8g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux