2009/8/10 Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:41:14AM +0200, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: >> As for actual deliverables, i'm not too picky, just as long as there >> is a tarball which is a bunch of patches or a git repo, or something >> that Google requires. > > Hmm. That is a reasonable interpretation but seems to miss the spirit > of the matter. When I see a project with a goal of, "Web-based > wysiwyg DocBook editor for Fedora Docs," I presume there is going to > be a working instance of something at the end. > > If all we had was a tarball + patches, we'd be far from a > working-to-use system. For example, this is why the Beacon packaging > was suggested in the original proposal to begin ASAP -- so the package > would be available to Fedora Infrastructure for their build-out of the > "working instance of something." > > In my GSoC experience, projects that focus on a working web service > (for example) with a minimum feature set are more successful than a > complete feature set in a tarball + patches. > > I think that goal was clear to Satya and yourself, so this is just > further encouragement to keep it a high priority. Let me clear this up. That's what Satya needs to deliver to Google in order to get paid. In order for me to pass her though, i want to see something working, namely a demo online that people are evaluating. -Yaakov -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
