2009/8/9 sankarshan <foss.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:50 PM, satya > komaragiri<satya.komaragiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The last line also made me wonder if my deliverables for GSoC have >> changed. It would be very convenient for me to know what is my to-do >> from GSoC perspective. I am not limiting this project till SoC and >> will make sure I work on it till it is in production use but knowing >> what is expected for SoC can help me order the tasks accordingly. > > I would think that the scope of work as part of your GSoC and, the > scope of work beyond GSoC is something that should be worked out > between your mentor and, yourself. I am tempted to say that the list > of points (just above the paragraph I quoted) does make a significant > difference to the functionality, however, whether you want to do it as > part of your GSoC or, would like to continue rolling them up into > scheduled releases is something one should leave to your sound > judgement. Just my comments, as the mentor. The deliverable i want to see is the docs team using the results of Satya's work. The actual things that need to be implemented are depedent on what the docs team would like to see. There isn't much time left to GSoC, and i don't know how much time Satya will have to work on the project afterwards. I think the best thing to do is to get it working on Fedora Infrastructure as a working usable demo, so people can experiment with it and see if it meets our needs. Then, Satya should use her best judgement on how to spend the rest of the time. As for actual deliverables, i'm not too picky, just as long as there is a tarball which is a bunch of patches or a git repo, or something that Google requires. -Yaakov -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
