Re: Packages loaded into Fedora by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 15:20, John J. McDonough<wb8rcr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "For participants of the Documentation Project"
> <fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 2:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Packages loaded into Fedora by default
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:30:18AM -0400, Paul Frields wrote:
>
>> Also, I wanted to point out that if you want to retire
>> fedora-release-notes, the sooner the better, especially since the
>> Desktop SIG has to consider eliminating things from the Live spin each
>> release due to space constraints.  The fedora-release-notes package is
>> fairly sizable IIRC, and this time around The GIMP is on the chopping
>> block.
>
> I'm not so sure we want to retire fedora-release-notes, but we do hope to
> put it on a diet.  Unfortunately, I'm not ready to make any promises.
>
> --McD

Yeah, I don't think it should go on the chopping block but it probably
won't be the same package it has been in years past.

--Eric

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux